Toppers, placements and rankings are the most persuasive things a college or coaching institute can advertise. They're also the claims regulators check hardest. Here's exactly what ASCI and the CCPA require, and how to build the proof before the campaign goes live.
ASCI's guidelines say placement, salary, enrolment, admissions, marks, topper, ranking, faculty, foreign affiliation and infrastructure claims must relate to the latest completed academic year and be backed by evidence. Topper testimonials must come from students who studied only at your institute; placement numbers must state the total batch size; rankings must name the publication and date. The CCPA adds written consent taken after the result and disclosure of the course and whether it was paid.
- ASCI clause 5(a): key claims must relate to the latest completed academic year and be substantiated.
- Topper testimonials must come from students who completed the programme only at your institute.
- Placement numbers must state the total batch size; rankings must name the publication and its date.
- CCPA: written consent must be taken after the student's success, with course details and paid/free status disclosed.
- From around May 2027, using a minor topper's name or photo will also need verifiable parental consent under DPDP.
Why proof matters more than ever
Toppers, placements and rankings are the most persuasive things an education brand can advertise. They're also the claims regulators look at hardest. ASCI's monitoring in April to September 2025 found most ads it examined needed changes, and almost all violations were online (ASCI, Nov 2025):
ASCI's review of advertising, April to September 2025
For coaching centres, the stakes are legal as well as reputational. By December 2024, the Central Consumer Protection Authority had issued notices to 45 coaching centres and imposed penalties of ₹61.6 lakh on 19 institutes for misleading advertisements (PIB, Dec 2024). We covered the big four banned claims in 4 admission-ad claims ASCI won't let you make. This post goes deeper on the claims you can make, if you can prove them.
The latest-year rule
Clause 5(a) of ASCI's guidelines for educational advertising says ads shall not make certain claims unless they relate to the latest completed academic year and are substantiated with evidence (ASCI). The claims it covers are the ones education brands use most:
| Claim | What ASCI requires | Evidence to keep on file |
|---|---|---|
| Share of the passing batch placed | Latest completed year, substantiated; must also state the total number of students passing out (clause 5(e)) | Placement list for the batch, total batch size, employer confirmations |
| Highest or average salary | Latest completed year, substantiated | Offer letters or employer confirmations; the calculation behind any average |
| Student enrolment | Latest completed year, substantiated | Admission registers for that year |
| Admissions to well-known institutions | Latest completed year, substantiated | Admission letters or result records, with consent |
| Marks and ranks | Latest completed year, substantiated | Official result sheets or rank cards |
| Topper testimonials | From students who completed the programme, exam or subject only at your institute (clause 5(d)) | Enrolment and attendance records, plus written consent |
| Competitive ranking | Must give the full name and date of the publication that released it (clause 5(b)) | The ranking certificate or publication link |
| Faculty size and qualifications | Latest completed year, substantiated | Faculty register and qualification records |
| Foreign affiliation | Latest completed year, substantiated | The signed agreement with the foreign institution |
| Infrastructure | Visuals must be real and existing when the ad is released (clause 5(c)) | Recent, dated photos of your own campus |
Topper testimonials: three tests
1. Did they study here, and only here?
ASCI says testimonials of toppers must come from students who completed the programme, exam or subject only from the advertising institute (ASCI). A student who studied mainly elsewhere and took a short crash course with you can't be presented as your product.
2. Do you have consent, taken after the result?
The CCPA's coaching guidelines bar using a student's name, photo or testimonial without written consent, and that consent must be obtained after the student's success (PIB, Nov 2024). A clause in the enrolment form doesn't count.
3. Are you disclosing what they actually took?
Under the CCPA guidelines, ads must show the student's name, rank and course details alongside their photo, and state clearly whether the student paid for the course. Disclaimers must be as prominent as the other important details (PIB, Nov 2024).
There's a fourth test coming. Many toppers in school boards and entrance exams are under 18. Once India's DPDP Rules apply in full, around May 2027, using a child's personal data, including their name and photo in an ad, will need verifiable consent from a parent. The exemptions for educational institutions cover educational activities and safety, not advertising (DPDP Rules). See the DPDP checklist for marketers.
Placement claims: always give the denominator
"350 students placed" means very little on its own. ASCI requires any ad that states the number of students placed to also state the total number of students passing out from that class (ASCI). And ASCI bars 100% claims about outcomes that can't be measured, such as "100% placement assistance".
| Risky | Compliant |
|---|---|
| "350+ placements!" | "350 of 412 students in our 2025 MBA batch were placed." |
| "Packages up to ₹40 LPA" | "Highest offer in the 2025 batch: ₹40 LPA. Average: [figure], across [number] placed students." |
| "100% placement assistance" | "Every 2025 student had access to [named support]. [X] recruiters visited campus." |
| Placements from 2019 to 2025 added together | Figures for the latest completed academic year only |
Rankings, faculty and campus
- Rankings: name the publication and the date. "Ranked #3" isn't enough; "Ranked #3 among private engineering colleges in [state], [publication], [month and year]" is.
- Faculty: "200+ PhD faculty" needs a faculty register behind it, for the latest completed year.
- Campus: every building, lab and hostel in your ads must exist when the ad runs. Architectural renders of a block that isn't built yet don't qualify, and neither do stock photos of someone else's campus.
- Disclaimers: where ASCI requires the line "past record is no guarantee of future prospects", its font can't be smaller than the claim it qualifies (ASCI).
Build an evidence file before the campaign
The simplest way to stay compliant is to build the proof first and the ads second. Before admission season, put together one evidence file per campaign:
- Placement records for the latest completed batch, with the total batch size and employer confirmations.
- Salary data behind every highest or average figure, with the calculation.
- Topper records showing each student completed your programme, plus written consent dated after their result, and parental consent where they're minors.
- Ranking certificates or publication links, with dates.
- Faculty records supporting any faculty claim.
- Dated photos of your actual campus and facilities.
- Approval and affiliation documents for any recognition or foreign tie-up claim.
- A sign-off log: who checked each creative against the evidence, and when.
Store it in your own systems, not an agency's. When ASCI or a parent asks for proof, you should be able to produce it in minutes.
A coaching institute's NEET campaign features six toppers under the line "Our toppers, our pride". Two had joined only for a four-week test series, consent was taken in the enrolment form, and none of the posts say which course each student took or whether they paid.
The compliant version features the four toppers who completed the full two-year programme, each with written consent signed after the result (and a parent's consent for the one who was 17), their rank, course name and a clear note that the course was paid. Fewer faces. Much stronger ad, because every claim stands up.
Real results are your best marketing. The rules don't stop you using them; they ask you to prove them. For the wider picture, read ASCI's rules for admission ads, and once enquiries come in, answer them fast.
This is general information, not legal advice. Check the current ASCI code and CCPA guidelines before publishing.
How Ad Asthra helps education brands advertise with proof
We build admissions marketing that leads with real results, and the systems that keep the evidence ready.
Frequently asked questions
Can colleges advertise placement records?
Yes, if the figures relate to the latest completed academic year, are backed by evidence, and state the total number of students passing out alongside the number placed.
What are ASCI's rules on topper testimonials?
Topper testimonials must come from students who completed the programme, exam or subject only at the advertising institute, and like other result claims they must relate to the latest completed academic year and be substantiated.
Do coaching centres need consent to use topper photos?
Yes. The CCPA's coaching guidelines bar using a student's name, photo or testimonial without written consent, which must be taken after the student's success, not at enrolment.
What must a coaching ad disclose about a topper?
The student's name, rank and course details alongside their photo, and whether the student paid for the course, with disclaimers as prominent as the other key details.
Can I mention our ranking in ads?
Yes, but ASCI requires you to give the full name and date of the publication or medium that released the ranking.
Can I use architectural renders of a new campus in ads?
ASCI says visuals of infrastructure must be real and existing at the time the ad is released, so renders of unbuilt facilities shouldn't be presented as your campus.
Do DPDP rules affect topper ads?
Yes. From around May 2027, using a child's personal data, including a minor topper's name or photo, needs verifiable parental consent, and education exemptions don't cover advertising.
How does Ad Asthra help education brands?
We build admissions campaigns from a verified evidence file, review creatives against ASCI and CCPA rules, and set up CRM and consent records in your own systems.
Sources
- ASCI Guidelines for Advertising of Educational Institutions, Programmes and Platforms, Advertising Standards Council of India, 2023 revision
- Central Consumer Protection Authority Issues Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisement in Coaching Sector, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 13 November 2024
- CCPA issues notices to 45 coaching centres for misleading advertisement; imposes penalty of Rs 61,60,000 on 19 coaching institutes, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 17 December 2024
- Digital media account for 97% of violations in ASCI's Half-Yearly Complaints Report 2025-26, Advertising Standards Council of India, November 2025
- Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025 (G.S.R. 846(E)), Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Gazette of India, 13 November 2025
Last updated
Planning your next admissions campaign? Let's build it on evidence you can show.
Message us on WhatsApp or book a call